The Galactic Chessboard: A Comparative Analysis of Space Warfare Strategies Employed by the US, Russia, and China

Abstract

It is becoming increasingly important to understand the implications of military strategies moving beyond our planet and their impact on our security. This research paper conducts a comparative analysis of space warfare strategies and policies employed by the United States, Russia, and China. This research was conducted using a qualitative methodology, specifically employing a comparative analysis method to examine and interpret the data. This study explores historical contexts, strategic objectives, technological advancements, and the ride, with initial caution giving way to more ambitious actions, then returning to careful exploration by the end of the 20th century (Launius, 2000). The militarization of space is becoming a key part of national security for the United States, China, and Russia. The modern space systems play a critical role in modern warfare. They provide the military with precise communication, such as real-time intelligence, surveillance capabilities, and accurate navigation. geopolitical implications of each nation's approach and designs anti-satellite (ASAT) weapons to be used against America’s supremacy. Meanwhile, Russia is improving its ASAT technology so that it can catch up with both China and US. This paper also analyzes the patterns of ASAT testing, the ASAT test ban treaty, and the risk posed by Chinese and Russian ASAT weapons to U.S. space assets. Although the U.S. has the largest budget and can also act swiftly than any other country, there is a significant growth in counter-space technologies from China and Russia. China and Russia did not sign the ASAT test ban treaty because they want to maintain strategic balance and are sceptical of U.S. intentions. This study concludes that these space strategies influence global security. This paper points out that in order to deal with the hazards of the militarization of space we have to continue investing in space security, and arms restrictions should be carried out while we also cooperate internationally.