| dc.description.abstract | This comparative analysis explores the legal frameworks for protecting industrial
designs in Sri Lanka, India, and Japan, focusing on definitions, registration processes, and
infringement rights. While all three countries emphasize the visual appeal and novelty of designs,
significant differences exist in the scope and specificity of their respective laws. Sri Lanka's legal
system offers partial recognition and lacks clear infringement provisions, while India provides
robust protection with exclusive rights and clear definitions. Japan has the best protection, with
comprehensive laws and remedies. Recommendations for enhancing Sri Lanka's industrial design
protection include strengthening enforcement mechanisms, raising public awareness, and
enacting a dedicated industrial design act. By adopting best practices from India and Japan, Sri
Lanka can strengthen its intellectual property regime and foster innovation, creativity, and
economic growth. | en_US |
