| dc.description.abstract | The world is experiencing a technology evolution that will surpass the industrial revolution
and change nearly every area of our professional and personal lives, including how disputes occur and
are handled. Artificial intelligence will transform international arbitration by increasing the efficiency
and accuracy of decision-making procedures. AI will aid with case management, data analysis, and
decision-making. However, in complicated and high-stakes environments such as international
arbitration, human monitoring is required to ensure fairness and justice. Human arbitrators may bring to
the table not only ethical judgment and cultural sensitivity, but also interpretive nuance in the use of
legal reasons, which is required to make fair and fully informed verdicts. The paper argues against and
in favor of the broad use of AI in arbitration, focusing on legal problems and doing a comparative
analysis of countries where AI has been deployed or limited. Case studies and legal frameworks
demonstrate the need for human arbitrators in maintaining the integrity of the arbitration process. The
suggestion is also founded on the fact that when AI is integrated, human oversight is applied in a way
that strikes a balance between justice and due process. | en_US |
