dc.description.abstract | The seas and oceans as the largest eco-system in the world have been polluted from
various sources throughout history. This global issue is mainly caused by states through
land-based sources. Even though there are international rules, regulations and standards
to prevent and control marine pollution through land-based sources by states, in the
contemporary legal arena, States utilise the principle of sovereignty to escape from
their obligation towards land-based marine pollution. Since the states have their own
sovereignty within their territory, it has become difficult for the international community
to intervene in the activities that cause land-based marine pollution. However, Customary
International Law has answered this growing issue by recognising that international
law also includes States’ responsibility towards other states and the world to protect
the environment. Further, this concept of customary law was adopted by the United
Nations Convention of the Law of the Sea, 1982, and the obligation imposed through
the Convention was inadequate to control the said problem. Based on doctrinal research
methodology, this study will analyse international conventions, case laws, law reports and
law journals to identify how the international law concept of sovereignty has been reinterpreted
by the international customary law concept of State Responsibility. Further,
this will analyse the insufficiency of the adoption of this concept at the global level and
how this lacuna has been well addressed and answered by soft laws and regional legal
orders to regulate land-based marine pollution activities. | en_US |