• Login
    • University Home
    • Library Home
    • Lib Catalogue
    • Advance Search
    View Item 
    •   IR@KDU Home
    • INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH CONFERENCE ARTICLES (KDU IRC)
    • 2018 IRC Articles
    • Medicine
    • View Item
    •   IR@KDU Home
    • INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH CONFERENCE ARTICLES (KDU IRC)
    • 2018 IRC Articles
    • Medicine
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Cytotoxic Effect of Peel and Pericarp of Sri Lankan Pomegranate Fruit “Delum” (Punica granatum L.) and Comparison of Different Extraction Methods

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    b584250a4e22-p-44.pdf (176.8Kb)
    Date
    2018
    Author
    Bandara, UY
    Witharana, C
    Soysa, P
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Phytochemicals of fruits and vegetables have anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory and antiproliferative properties. In Sri Lanka, parts of the native Pomegranate tree, “Delum” (fruit, barks and leaves) are used in ayurvedic medicine as a treatment for cancers. Nevertheless, the scientific basis of these treatments are not yet explored. Anti-proliferative activity was assessed with MTT assay for Human Rhabdomyosarcoma (RD) after 24 h exposure to the Pomegranate fruit peel and pericarp extracts. The cell morphology was recorded comparative to the positive (Cycloheximide) and negative controls (untreated cells). The aqueous extract of Pomegranate peel exhibited significant cytotoxicity (p < 0.05) than pericarp, against RD cells. After 24 h incubation at a 50% viability of RD cells, the required concentration of peel extract (EC50) was exhibited as 7.2±1.0, 9.2±0.6, 9.2±0.3, 10.6±0.8 and 10.7±1.1 for sonication extraction, sonication followed by microwaving, microwave assisted extraction, heating in a 50°C water bath and boiling with electric burner extraction methods respectively. The peel extract obtained by the sonication method exhibited the lowest EC50 value. In contrast, pericarp extracts revealed a higher EC50 values than peel extracts. Therefore, we conclude that Sonication as an extraction method exerted a higher anti-proliferative activity comparative to the other extraction methods.
    URI
    http://ir.kdu.ac.lk/handle/345/2711
    Collections
    • Medicine [30]

    Library copyright © 2017  General Sir John Kotelawala Defence University, Sri Lanka
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     

    Browse

    All of IR@KDUCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsFacultyDocument TypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsFacultyDocument Type

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Library copyright © 2017  General Sir John Kotelawala Defence University, Sri Lanka
    Contact Us | Send Feedback