<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>Law</title>
<link href="https://ir.kdu.ac.lk/handle/345/6715" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>https://ir.kdu.ac.lk/handle/345/6715</id>
<updated>2026-05-05T11:27:43Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-05-05T11:27:43Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>The Legal Protection of Coral Reefs in Sri Lanka: A Critical Analysis</title>
<link href="https://ir.kdu.ac.lk/handle/345/6783" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Boraluwa, BRSL</name>
</author>
<id>https://ir.kdu.ac.lk/handle/345/6783</id>
<updated>2023-11-03T03:15:48Z</updated>
<published>2023-09-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The Legal Protection of Coral Reefs in Sri Lanka: A Critical Analysis
Boraluwa, BRSL
Sri Lanka, being an island nation, has an abundance of coral reefs and reef ecosystems&#13;
situated around the country. However, they are currently under the threat of rapid&#13;
deterioration due to adverse human activities. Even though this deterioration is happening&#13;
at an alarming rate, it does not receive the necessary attention of society. This paper seeks&#13;
to analyze the Sri Lankan legal framework on the protection of coral reefs to ascertain&#13;
whether it provides a satisfactory framework to protect the coral reefs situated around&#13;
the country against the threats of damage. This research employed the comparative&#13;
legal method to compare Sri Lankan law with international standards to determine the&#13;
lessons for law reform. The methodology of this paper is mainly based on the black&#13;
letter approach and data is gathered from both primary and secondary sources. This&#13;
study concludes that the Sri Lankan legal system is inadequate to address the threats&#13;
faced by coral reef ecosystems which escalates the destruction and thereby, recognizes the&#13;
importance of adapting from international standards to the Sri Lankan legal system to&#13;
preserve these invaluable resources for future generations.
</summary>
<dc:date>2023-09-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Intellectual Property Law Vs Human Rights Law: A Re-Examination of the Relationship Between Two Distinct Legal Regimes in Light of Digitalization and Sustainability</title>
<link href="https://ir.kdu.ac.lk/handle/345/6782" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Shihan, MMM</name>
</author>
<id>https://ir.kdu.ac.lk/handle/345/6782</id>
<updated>2023-11-03T02:51:08Z</updated>
<published>2023-09-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Intellectual Property Law Vs Human Rights Law: A Re-Examination of the Relationship Between Two Distinct Legal Regimes in Light of Digitalization and Sustainability
Shihan, MMM
In simple terms, intellectual property rights are rights that recognize and provide incentives&#13;
for inventions connected to social development. On the other hand, human rights&#13;
are basic natural rights that are inheritable and contingent upon human dignity. While&#13;
the right to protection of the “moral and material interests” of an individual’s intellectual&#13;
product is enshrined in the canon of international human rights, it could be argued that&#13;
the dominant regime of intellectual property rights has historically come into conflict&#13;
with other fundamental human rights of ordinary customers of intellectual property. The&#13;
paper, hence, re-examines their relationship; firstly, for the impacts of intellectual property&#13;
rights on the realization of human rights such as the right to health, which has become&#13;
much more visible following the adoption of the ‘TRIPS’ Agreement and digitalization,&#13;
and secondly, due to the increasing importance of intellectual property rights that has&#13;
led to the need for clarifying the scope of human rights provisions protecting individual&#13;
contributions to knowledge, while drawing a distinct line between intellectual property&#13;
rights that protect and grant exclusive rights to new creators and the possible infringements&#13;
it may cause for individual human rights of ordinary customers, and proceeds to&#13;
identify that in relation to human rights, two strains of intellectual property thoughts have&#13;
become increasingly prevalent: the first deals with the integration of human rights, while&#13;
the second explores the possibilities of intellectual property as a mechanism of social&#13;
justice and sustainability. The information necessary to conduct the study was collected&#13;
through statutory analysis, while library research, provides secondary information by&#13;
analogies of relevant scholarly articles and books. The paper in conclusion proves that&#13;
intellectual property protection of the future must protect fundamental human rights by&#13;
ensuring access to life-saving and life-improving technologies with sustainability while&#13;
continuing to respect the material and moral interests of the individuals behind these&#13;
vital innovations in a digitalized world.
</summary>
<dc:date>2023-09-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Legal Aspects of Challenges and Privacy Concerns in Establishing and Maintaining a Forensic DNA Database in Sri Lanka</title>
<link href="https://ir.kdu.ac.lk/handle/345/6781" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Rathnayake, SM</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Mayadunne, YM</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Liyanage, KO</name>
</author>
<id>https://ir.kdu.ac.lk/handle/345/6781</id>
<updated>2023-11-03T02:44:36Z</updated>
<published>2023-09-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Legal Aspects of Challenges and Privacy Concerns in Establishing and Maintaining a Forensic DNA Database in Sri Lanka
Rathnayake, SM; Mayadunne, YM; Liyanage, KO
This research has been conducted to identify the legal aspects of challenges and privacy&#13;
concerns in establishing and maintaining a forensic DNA database in Sri Lanka. Establishing&#13;
a forensic DNA database in Sri Lanka raises legal, financial, and practical issues.&#13;
This research observes the laws and regulations in an international context and identifies&#13;
the lack of legislation in the country that concerns the legal aspects of establishing a&#13;
forensic DNA database. A qualitative research methodology is adopted to collect primary&#13;
and secondary data. Lack of a specified DNA identification act, legality of the DNA&#13;
concerning privacy and human rights, issues in accessing, protecting, and securing DNA&#13;
information, and retention and deletion of DNA information were identified as the main&#13;
legal issues in establishing a national forensic DNA database. Sri Lanka must strike&#13;
a compromise between the need for effective law enforcement and the preservation of&#13;
private information in the establishment of a forensic DNA database.
</summary>
<dc:date>2023-09-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Adequacy of Constitutional Provisions in Sri Lanka to Recognize Custodial Death as a Violation of Right to Life: A Comparative Analysis with India</title>
<link href="https://ir.kdu.ac.lk/handle/345/6780" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Sasantha, RTS</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Prasadika, KGB</name>
</author>
<id>https://ir.kdu.ac.lk/handle/345/6780</id>
<updated>2023-11-03T02:40:52Z</updated>
<published>2023-09-01T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Adequacy of Constitutional Provisions in Sri Lanka to Recognize Custodial Death as a Violation of Right to Life: A Comparative Analysis with India
Sasantha, RTS; Prasadika, KGB
Custodial death is one of the worst crimes in civilized society which is governed by the&#13;
rule of law. The deaths of accused/suspects remain a very controversial topic not only&#13;
in a particular country or region but in the world and it has been happening for a quite&#13;
long time in Sri Lanka. Sri Lankan Criminal Justice System sorely lacks substantial&#13;
legislative provisions to regulate the right to life due to the fact that it is questioned&#13;
whether any specific provision to address custodial deaths in the constitution. Many other&#13;
nations have already recognized this right as fundamental and adopted comprehensive&#13;
legislative provisions for custodial deaths. Both constitution and the Supreme Court of&#13;
India have forbidden custodial torture in a progressive manner. But it is questioned&#13;
whether Sri Lanka’s constitutional provisions are adequate to address this issue. Hence,&#13;
there is an urgent requirement to address this issue and fix this deficiency in the existing&#13;
justice delivery framework in Sri Lanka to set legitimate principles for custodial deaths.&#13;
This study aims to analyse the main theoretical debates within the academic field.&#13;
order to identify the current lack of custodial deaths in Sri Lanka, analyse how custodial&#13;
deaths cases are handled within the framework of the Indian jurisdiction and Sri Lankan&#13;
jurisdiction and use the findings of the study to make proposals and recommendations&#13;
to use it in the human rights field. The qualitative method, including primary data and&#13;
secondary data, was used for this research. The study concludes that there are less and&#13;
no adequate constitutional provisions available in the current constitution of Sri Lanka to&#13;
address issues pertaining to custodial death compared to the Indian Constitution. Hence,&#13;
an urgent constitutional amendment is required to address the issue.
</summary>
<dc:date>2023-09-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
